Review-Prozess/en: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen
(Die Seite wurde neu angelegt: „The review process involves a standardized correction process following submission of a contribution. Textual and formal requirements must be fulfilled in orde…“) |
(Die Seite wurde neu angelegt: „==Additional Information== You can learn more about the review process via the following links: * Review-Prozess - Informationen für Autoren und Autorinnen|…“) |
||
| Zeile 2: | Zeile 2: | ||
The review process involves a standardized correction process following submission of a contribution. Textual and formal requirements must be fulfilled in order to make an article visible for all recipients and for educational material to be made available for teachers and students in medicine. Our aim is to ensure the highest scientific standards for our users. A review board consisting of experts in various disciplines assists us in making this possible. Each submitted article is reviewed by a specialist in the related area, thus allowing for an optimal feedback on an expert level. A formal standard can be ensured by the subsequent editorial review. If a submitted article is found to contain textual and/or formal errors, the author has the opportunity to make changes online. The article or educational material will be unlocked and visible online only after all inaccuracies have been removed. | The review process involves a standardized correction process following submission of a contribution. Textual and formal requirements must be fulfilled in order to make an article visible for all recipients and for educational material to be made available for teachers and students in medicine. Our aim is to ensure the highest scientific standards for our users. A review board consisting of experts in various disciplines assists us in making this possible. Each submitted article is reviewed by a specialist in the related area, thus allowing for an optimal feedback on an expert level. A formal standard can be ensured by the subsequent editorial review. If a submitted article is found to contain textual and/or formal errors, the author has the opportunity to make changes online. The article or educational material will be unlocked and visible online only after all inaccuracies have been removed. | ||
| − | == | + | ==Additional Information== |
| − | + | You can learn more about the review process via the following links: | |
| − | * [[Review-Prozess - Informationen für Autoren und Autorinnen]] | + | * [[Review-Prozess - Informationen für Autoren und Autorinnen|Review Process: Information for Authors]] |
| − | * [[Review-Prozess - Informationen für Reviewer und Reviewerinnen]] | + | * [[Review-Prozess - Informationen für Reviewer und Reviewerinnen|Review Process: Information for Reviewers]] |
== MitgliederInnen des Review- & Beirat-Boards == | == MitgliederInnen des Review- & Beirat-Boards == | ||
Version vom 4. Juli 2016, 18:11 Uhr
<languages /> The review process involves a standardized correction process following submission of a contribution. Textual and formal requirements must be fulfilled in order to make an article visible for all recipients and for educational material to be made available for teachers and students in medicine. Our aim is to ensure the highest scientific standards for our users. A review board consisting of experts in various disciplines assists us in making this possible. Each submitted article is reviewed by a specialist in the related area, thus allowing for an optimal feedback on an expert level. A formal standard can be ensured by the subsequent editorial review. If a submitted article is found to contain textual and/or formal errors, the author has the opportunity to make changes online. The article or educational material will be unlocked and visible online only after all inaccuracies have been removed.
Additional Information
You can learn more about the review process via the following links:
MitgliederInnen des Review- & Beirat-Boards
Als MitgliederInnen des Review-Boards haben sich bereits Experten und Expertinnen verschiedenster Fachdisziplinen zusammengefunden. Folgende Mitwirkende unterstützen GenderMed-Wiki bereits mit Ihrer Review-Tätigkeit:
PD Dr. Jan Becker, Dr. Gudrun Beyer, Prof. Dr. Birgit Breninger, Prof. Dr. Alena Buyx, Prof. Dr. Dr. Katharina Domschke, Dr. Doris Dorsel, Prof. Dr. Christian Fegeler, Dr. Christine Fischer, PD Dr. Dr. Christiane Gleissner, Prof. Dr. Joachim Hasebrook, Prof. Dr. Anke Henney, Prof. Dr. Margarete Hochleitner, Annegret Hofmann, Dr. Maren A. Jochimsen, PD Dr. Andrea Kindler-Röhrborn, PD Dr. Bas de Leng, PD Dr. Elisabeth Livingstone, Dr. Sabine Oertelt-Prigione, Prof. Dr. Dr. Bettina Pfleiderer, Prof. Dr. Beate Rau, Prof. Dr. Sonja Ständer, Prof. Dr. Petra Thürmann
Gerne möchten wir die Zahl der ReviewerInnen noch erweitern. Falls Sie Interesse haben, in den fachlichen ReviewerInnen-Pool für GenderMed-Wiki aufgenommen zu werden, kontaktieren Sie bitte die Projektleiterin:
Prof. Dr. med. Dr. rer. nat. Bettina Pfleiderer
E-Mail: pfleide@uni-muenster.de