Review-Prozess/en: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen
(Die Seite wurde neu angelegt: „The review process involves a standardized correction process following submission of a contribution. Textual and formal requirements must be fulfilled in orde…“) |
Julia (Diskussion | Beiträge) |
||
| (10 dazwischenliegende Versionen von 3 Benutzern werden nicht angezeigt) | |||
| Zeile 2: | Zeile 2: | ||
The review process involves a standardized correction process following submission of a contribution. Textual and formal requirements must be fulfilled in order to make an article visible for all recipients and for educational material to be made available for teachers and students in medicine. Our aim is to ensure the highest scientific standards for our users. A review board consisting of experts in various disciplines assists us in making this possible. Each submitted article is reviewed by a specialist in the related area, thus allowing for an optimal feedback on an expert level. A formal standard can be ensured by the subsequent editorial review. If a submitted article is found to contain textual and/or formal errors, the author has the opportunity to make changes online. The article or educational material will be unlocked and visible online only after all inaccuracies have been removed. | The review process involves a standardized correction process following submission of a contribution. Textual and formal requirements must be fulfilled in order to make an article visible for all recipients and for educational material to be made available for teachers and students in medicine. Our aim is to ensure the highest scientific standards for our users. A review board consisting of experts in various disciplines assists us in making this possible. Each submitted article is reviewed by a specialist in the related area, thus allowing for an optimal feedback on an expert level. A formal standard can be ensured by the subsequent editorial review. If a submitted article is found to contain textual and/or formal errors, the author has the opportunity to make changes online. The article or educational material will be unlocked and visible online only after all inaccuracies have been removed. | ||
| − | == | + | ==Additional Information== |
| − | + | You can learn more about the review process via the following links: | |
| − | * [[Review-Prozess - Informationen für Autoren und Autorinnen]] | + | * [[Review-Prozess - Informationen für Autoren und Autorinnen|Review Process: Information for Authors]] |
| − | * [[Review-Prozess - Informationen für Reviewer und Reviewerinnen]] | + | * [[Review-Prozess - Informationen für Reviewer und Reviewerinnen|Review Process: Information for Reviewers]] |
| − | == | + | == Members of the Review and Advisory Boards == |
| − | |||
| − | + | Experts in several disciplines serve as members of the review board. The following reviewers already support GenderMed-Wiki by assisting with the review process: | |
| + | PD Dr. Jan Becker, Dr. Gudrun Beyer, Prof. Dr. Birgit Breninger, Prof. Dr. Alena Buyx, Dr. med. Dirk Deuster, Prof. Dr. Dr. Katharina Domschke M.A., Dr. Doris Dorsel, Prof. Dr. Christian Fegeler, Dr. Christine Fischer, PD Dr. med. Dr. med. dent. Christiane Gleissner, Prof. Dr. Joachim Hasebrook, Prof. Dr. Anke Hinney, Prof. Dr. Margarethe Hochleitner, Annegret Hofmann, Dr. Maren A. Jochimsen, PD Dr. Andrea Kindler-Röhrborn, PD Dr. Bas de Leng, PD Dr. Elisabeth Livingstone, Prof. Dr. Anne-Maria Möller-Leimkühler, Prof. Dr. Dorothée Nashan, Dr. med. dent. Tim Nolting M.Sc, Dr. Sabine Oertelt-Prigione, Prof. Dr. Dr. Bettina Pfleiderer, Prof. Dr. Beate Rau, Prof. Dr. med. Gudrun Schneider, Prof. Dr. Sonja Ständer, Prof. Dr. Petra Thürmann, Dr. Anja Vervoorts | ||
| − | |||
| + | We would like to further expand the number of reviewers. If you are interested in joining GenderMed-Wiki's peer review pool, please contact the project manager: | ||
| − | '''Prof. Dr. med. Dr. rer. nat. Bettina Pfleiderer<br /> E-Mail: pfleide | + | |
| + | '''Prof. Dr. med. Dr. rer. nat. Bettina Pfleiderer<br /> E-Mail: pfleide(ad)uni-muenster.de''' | ||
Aktuelle Version vom 26. Januar 2017, 14:20 Uhr
<languages /> The review process involves a standardized correction process following submission of a contribution. Textual and formal requirements must be fulfilled in order to make an article visible for all recipients and for educational material to be made available for teachers and students in medicine. Our aim is to ensure the highest scientific standards for our users. A review board consisting of experts in various disciplines assists us in making this possible. Each submitted article is reviewed by a specialist in the related area, thus allowing for an optimal feedback on an expert level. A formal standard can be ensured by the subsequent editorial review. If a submitted article is found to contain textual and/or formal errors, the author has the opportunity to make changes online. The article or educational material will be unlocked and visible online only after all inaccuracies have been removed.
Additional Information
You can learn more about the review process via the following links:
Members of the Review and Advisory Boards
Experts in several disciplines serve as members of the review board. The following reviewers already support GenderMed-Wiki by assisting with the review process:
PD Dr. Jan Becker, Dr. Gudrun Beyer, Prof. Dr. Birgit Breninger, Prof. Dr. Alena Buyx, Dr. med. Dirk Deuster, Prof. Dr. Dr. Katharina Domschke M.A., Dr. Doris Dorsel, Prof. Dr. Christian Fegeler, Dr. Christine Fischer, PD Dr. med. Dr. med. dent. Christiane Gleissner, Prof. Dr. Joachim Hasebrook, Prof. Dr. Anke Hinney, Prof. Dr. Margarethe Hochleitner, Annegret Hofmann, Dr. Maren A. Jochimsen, PD Dr. Andrea Kindler-Röhrborn, PD Dr. Bas de Leng, PD Dr. Elisabeth Livingstone, Prof. Dr. Anne-Maria Möller-Leimkühler, Prof. Dr. Dorothée Nashan, Dr. med. dent. Tim Nolting M.Sc, Dr. Sabine Oertelt-Prigione, Prof. Dr. Dr. Bettina Pfleiderer, Prof. Dr. Beate Rau, Prof. Dr. med. Gudrun Schneider, Prof. Dr. Sonja Ständer, Prof. Dr. Petra Thürmann, Dr. Anja Vervoorts
We would like to further expand the number of reviewers. If you are interested in joining GenderMed-Wiki's peer review pool, please contact the project manager:
Prof. Dr. med. Dr. rer. nat. Bettina Pfleiderer
E-Mail: pfleide(ad)uni-muenster.de