Difference between revisions of "Review Process: Information for Reviewers"

(Reviewen von Lehrmaterialien)
 
(24 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Zuteilung zum Artikel ==
+
== Assigning an Article ==
Die Zuteilung zum jeweiligen Artikel erfolgt mit Hilfe eines Rotationssystems. Das heißt: Jede/r AutorIn kann seinem/ihrem Artikel bis zu drei Fächern zuordnen, sodass zuweilen mehrere ReviewerInnen für die Überprüfung zur Verfügung stehen. Diese Fächerzuordnung erfolgt hierarchisch, je nach dem wie  relevant oder passend das jeweilige Fach für den Artikel ist. Es ergibt sich dadurch eine ReviewerInnen-Liste.  
+
The assignment of each article occurs per a rotation system. This means that each author’s article or educational material can be assigned to up to 3 subjects so that several authors are more likely to be available. Subject assignment is hierarchical and dependent on how relevant or appropriate each subject is for the article. This results in a list of reviewers.  
  
Ein zu korrigierender Artikel wird immer an den/die erste/n auf der Liste geschickt. Sie erhalten nur dann eine Benachrichtigung per E-Mail, wenn Ihr Fachgebiet als am relevantesten oder passendsten eingestuft wurde oder der/die erste ReviewerIn auf der Liste den Review-Auftrag nicht annehmen konnte. Inhalt der E-Mail ist eine Zusammenfassung des Artikels sowie ein Link, der Sie zum vollständigen Artikel weiterleitet.
+
An article requiring revision is always sent to the first person on the list. You will only receive an e-mail notification if your field is classified as the most relevant or appropriate, or if the first reviewer on the list has declined to do the review. The e-mail contains a summary of the article as well as a link to the complete article.
  
Anschließend haben Sie fünf Tage Zeit, zu entscheiden, ob Sie den Review-Auftrag annehmen werden oder ablehnen müssen. Sobald Sie sich gegen eine Korrektur entschieden haben, wäre es zugunsten eines effektiven Ablaufs hilfreich, den Review-Status auf der Artikelseite von ''Wartet auf Bearbeitung'' in ''Review abgelehnt'' zu ändern. So erhält der/die nächste auf der ReviewerInnen-Liste frühzeitig eine Anfrage. Entscheiden Sie sich für das Reviewen, sollten Sie den Review-Status von ''Wartet auf Bearbeitung'' zu ''Review in Bearbeitung'' ändern.
+
You then have 5 days to decide whether or not you will accept the review. If you have chosen to decline performing a review, please change the review status on the article page from “review pending” to “review declined” to ensure that there are no hindrances to the review process. The next reviewer on the list will then receive a request to review the article. If you decide to accept a review, please change the review status from “review pending” to “review in process”.
  
== Review-Prozess ==
+
== Reviewing Articles ==  
===Reviewen von Artikeln===
+
You can now begin to review. There is an online review form available for which you first have to decide upon the following:
Nun können Sie mit dem Reviewen starten. Es handelt sich um eine online Review-Form, in der Sie zunächst folgendes entscheiden müssen:  
+
* I am in agreement with the contents of the article.
* Ich bin mit den Inhalten des Artikels einverstanden.
+
* I would like to make comments/suggestions pertaining to the article. <br />
* Ich möchte Anmerkungen/Vorschläge zum Artikel machen.<br />
 
  
  
Sind Sie mit der vorliegenden Fassung des Beitrags nicht einverstanden, erscheinen zwei Kommentarfelder für Ihre Anmerkungen: Im oberen Feld können Anmerkungen, Hinweise und Korrekturvorschläge an den/die AutorIn festgehalten werden. Das untere Feld ist für Anmerkungen an das Editorial Board vorgesehen und für die/den AutorIn nicht sichtbar.
+
If you do not agree with the current version of the submission, two commentary fields appear for your comments: In the upper commentary field, comments, tips and suggested corrections for the author can be found. The bottom commentary field is for comments made to the editorial board and invisible to the author.
  
===Reviewen von Lehrmaterialien===
+
== Reviewing Educational Material ==
Geben Sie bitte anschließend an, ob Lehrmaterialien zum Reviewen vorliegen. Sie können dann wieder entscheiden:
+
Please then specify whether or not educational materials are to also be made available. You can then decide:
* Ich stimme der Freigabe des Lehrmaterials zu.
+
* I agree to the release of the educational material.
* Ich möchte Anmerkungen/Vorschläge zum Lehrmaterial machen.
+
* I would like to make comments/suggestions pertaining to the educational material.
  
  
Halten Sie Änderungsvorschläge für notwendig, gilt es weiter zu spezifizieren, ob Sie Anmerkungen zu vorliegenden Fallbeispielen, Dias oder Videos machen möchten (wobei mehrere Lehrmaterialien ausgewählt werden können). Für jedes angekreuzte Lehrmaterial erscheint (genau wie beim Reviewen von Artikeln) ein Kommentarfeld für den/die AutorIn und ein Kommentarfeld für das Editorial Board. Zusätzlich zu den Freifeldern sollten Sie bitte auch folgende standardisierte Fragen beantworten:
+
If you consider changes to be necessary, the next step is to specify if you’d like to make comments on the case study, slides or videos (under the terms of which more educational material can be selected). For each educational material that has been checked, a separate commentary field appears for the author and editorial board. In addition to the free fields, you should also answer the following standardized questions:
  
* Wurde das Lehrmaterial dem richtigen Bereich zugeordnet?
+
* Is the educational material assigned to the correct field?
* Sind Lizenznachweise ausreichend erbracht?
+
* Is the educational material properly licensed?  
* Wurde das Lehrmaterial verständlich aufgearbeitet?
+
* Was the educational material made easy to understand?
  
 +
== Completing a Review ==
  
Vor Beendigung des Review-Prozesses müssen Sie noch entscheiden: Wollen Sie den Artikel vor der Freigabe bzw. nach eventuellen Änderungen nochmals sehen oder nicht? Bitte haken Sie das jeweilige Feld dazu ab.  
+
Before finishing the review process, you still need to decide upon the following: Do you want to view the article before its release or after possible changes, or not? Please tick the relevant box.  
  
Sobald Sie Ihren Review-Prozess abgeschlossen haben, können Sie den Review-Status von ''Review in Bearbeitung'' zu ''Review beendet'' ändern, damit sowohl das Editorial Board als auch der/die AutorIn Ihre Anmerkungen übermittelt bekommen. Ihr Reviewauftrag ist damit abgeschlossen. Sie werden (wenn gewünscht) benachrichtigt, sobald der/die AutorIn die Änderungsphase abgeschlossen hat sowie wenn der Artikel freigeschaltet ist.
+
After you have completed the review process, you can change the review status from “review in process” to “review completed” so that both the editorial board and author receive your commentary. With this, you have completed the review. You will then receive a notification (if requested) once the author has finished making changes and the article has been published.
 +
 
 +
 
 +
If you are unable to find the time to review an article within three weeks, you will receive an e-mail reminder which gives you another week’s time to complete the review following its arrival.
 +
 
 +
If you were unable to complete a review within four weeks, you will receive an e-mail notification stating that the review was sent to another colleague. You are then no longer held responsible for its completion.
 +
 
 +
== Important Information ==
 +
Please pay careful attention to the following aspects when working on your review:
 +
 
 +
* Only textual errors or inaccuracies, and not wording, are reviewed.
 +
* Spelling and grammar are only reviewed when there are serious errors.
 +
* Proofs of licensing are to be sufficiently provided and clearly assigned.
 +
* Please pay attention to gender-specific phrasing.
 +
 
 +
 
 +
'''Thank you for your support. GenderMed-Wiki looks forward to your involvement!'''
 +
 
 +
<br />

Latest revision as of 09:57, 31 January 2017

Assigning an Article

The assignment of each article occurs per a rotation system. This means that each author’s article or educational material can be assigned to up to 3 subjects so that several authors are more likely to be available. Subject assignment is hierarchical and dependent on how relevant or appropriate each subject is for the article. This results in a list of reviewers.

An article requiring revision is always sent to the first person on the list. You will only receive an e-mail notification if your field is classified as the most relevant or appropriate, or if the first reviewer on the list has declined to do the review. The e-mail contains a summary of the article as well as a link to the complete article.

You then have 5 days to decide whether or not you will accept the review. If you have chosen to decline performing a review, please change the review status on the article page from “review pending” to “review declined” to ensure that there are no hindrances to the review process. The next reviewer on the list will then receive a request to review the article. If you decide to accept a review, please change the review status from “review pending” to “review in process”.

Reviewing Articles

You can now begin to review. There is an online review form available for which you first have to decide upon the following:

  • I am in agreement with the contents of the article.
  • I would like to make comments/suggestions pertaining to the article.


If you do not agree with the current version of the submission, two commentary fields appear for your comments: In the upper commentary field, comments, tips and suggested corrections for the author can be found. The bottom commentary field is for comments made to the editorial board and invisible to the author.

Reviewing Educational Material

Please then specify whether or not educational materials are to also be made available. You can then decide:

  • I agree to the release of the educational material.
  • I would like to make comments/suggestions pertaining to the educational material.


If you consider changes to be necessary, the next step is to specify if you’d like to make comments on the case study, slides or videos (under the terms of which more educational material can be selected). For each educational material that has been checked, a separate commentary field appears for the author and editorial board. In addition to the free fields, you should also answer the following standardized questions:

  • Is the educational material assigned to the correct field?
  • Is the educational material properly licensed?
  • Was the educational material made easy to understand?

Completing a Review

Before finishing the review process, you still need to decide upon the following: Do you want to view the article before its release or after possible changes, or not? Please tick the relevant box.

After you have completed the review process, you can change the review status from “review in process” to “review completed” so that both the editorial board and author receive your commentary. With this, you have completed the review. You will then receive a notification (if requested) once the author has finished making changes and the article has been published.


If you are unable to find the time to review an article within three weeks, you will receive an e-mail reminder which gives you another week’s time to complete the review following its arrival.

If you were unable to complete a review within four weeks, you will receive an e-mail notification stating that the review was sent to another colleague. You are then no longer held responsible for its completion.

Important Information

Please pay careful attention to the following aspects when working on your review:

  • Only textual errors or inaccuracies, and not wording, are reviewed.
  • Spelling and grammar are only reviewed when there are serious errors.
  • Proofs of licensing are to be sufficiently provided and clearly assigned.
  • Please pay attention to gender-specific phrasing.


Thank you for your support. GenderMed-Wiki looks forward to your involvement!